{"id":4301,"date":"2025-05-23T05:44:10","date_gmt":"2025-05-23T05:44:10","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lawduniya.com\/?page_id=4301"},"modified":"2026-03-01T03:09:13","modified_gmt":"2026-03-01T03:09:13","slug":"allahabad-high-court-afr-landmark-judgments","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/lawduniya.com\/?page_id=4301","title":{"rendered":"Important Decisions that were in headlines"},"content":{"rendered":"\n\n\n\n\t\n\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t
Date<\/th>Headline Summary<\/th>Category<\/th>Tags<\/th>Link<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
05\/04\/2026<\/td>House Trespass Is An Offence Against Possession, True Owner Can\u2019t Unlawfully Enter Premises In Tenant\u2019s Lawful Possession: Kerala High Court<\/td>Criminal Trespass<\/td>House Trespass, Tenant Rights, Landlord Tenant Dispute<\/td>Link<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
05\/04\/2026<\/td>Disabled Employee Shifted To New Cadre Cannot Claim Seniority Based On Previous Service: Bombay High Court<\/td>Service Law <\/td>Disability Rights, Persons with Disabilities Act 1995, Section 47<\/td>Link<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
05\/04\/2026<\/td>Compassion Has No Place In Public Employment; No Second Chance For Candidate Who Skipped Physical Test : Supreme Court<\/td>Service Law <\/td>Recruitment Rules, Physical Test, No Second Chance,, Candidate Absenc<\/td>Link<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
05\/04\/2026<\/td>Compassionate Appointment Can't Be Denied On Ground Of Delay When Initial Application Was Timely: Rajasthan High Court<\/td>Service Law<\/td>Compassionate Appointment<\/td>Link<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
05\/04\/2026<\/td>POCSO Cases Can Be Quashed By Consent U\/S 528 BNSS; Discretion To Be Exercised As An Exception & With Caution: Meghalaya High Court<\/td>Criminal Law<\/td>Romeo Juliet Cases<\/td>Link<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
05\/04\/2026<\/td>No Parole For 'Arranging' Children's Marriage Or If Other Criminal Cases Pending: Allahabad High Court Denies Relief To Ex-MLA<\/td>Criminal Law<\/td>Parole<\/td>Link<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
05\/04\/2026<\/td>Mere Breach Of Promise To Marry Does Not Constitute Rape In Absence Of Initial Deception: Uttarakhand High Court <\/td>Criminal Law<\/td>Promise To Marry, Rape Law, False Promise, Section376IPC, Live In Relationship, Consensual Relationship<\/td>Link<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
05\/04\/2026<\/td>Homemaker no unskilled worker, takes no leave\u2019: Madhya Pradesh High Court raises payout for kin of woman killed in accident<\/td>Motor Accident Claim<\/td>Compensation<\/td>Link<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
05\/04\/2026<\/td>Electricity Supply Can't Be Denied To Occupant Due To Ownership Dispute: Andhra Pradesh High Court<\/td>Civil Litigation<\/td>Electricity Supply, Electricity A Basic Necessity, article21<\/td>Link<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
05\/04\/2026<\/td>Marital Rape Not Criminalised, But Forced Sex In Love Relationship Is Criminal: Gauhati High Court Refuses To Quash FIR<\/td>POCSO Act<\/td>Compromise in Criminal Cases, Victim Statement, Consent in Relationship<\/td>Link<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
05\/04\/2026<\/td>Mere Abuse Or Uttering Caste Name Not Offence Under SC\/ST Act: J&K&L High Court<\/td>Criminal Law <\/td>SC\/ST Act, Caste Based Humiliation<\/td>Link<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
05\/04\/2026<\/td>June 30 Retirement No Bar To July 1 Annual Increment- Delhi High Court<\/td>Service Law <\/td>Retirement, Annual Increment
\n
\n<\/td>		Link<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
05\/04\/2026<\/td>Mere Forwarding of Social Media Content Not an Offence Under BNS<\/td>Social Media Forwarding<\/td>Mens Rea, Criminal Intent, Fake News<\/td>Link<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
05\/04\/2026<\/td>S. 35 BNSS | Notice Of Appearance Must Be Served Physically, WhatsApp Or Email Not Valid Modes: Karnataka High Court <\/td>Notice of Appearance<\/td>Physical Service Of Notice, Whatsapp Mode, Electronic Communication<\/td>Link<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
05\/04\/2026<\/td>WhatsApp Notice Invalid Under Section 41A CrPC: Rajasthan HC Convicts Cop for Contempt in Violating Arnesh Kumar Guidelines<\/td>Notice of Appearance<\/td>WhatsApp Notice<\/td>Link<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
05\/04\/2026<\/td>Dismissal Of Suit For Default Not Res Judicata, But Party May Still Be Denied Relief For Abandoning Earlier Proceedings : Supreme Court<\/td>Litigation Procedure<\/td>Dismissal for Default, Civil Procedure Code, Adjudication on Merits<\/td>Link<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
05\/04\/2026<\/td>Complainant Has No Right To Be Heard In Penalty Proceedings Against SPIO U\/S 20 RTI Act: Kerala High Court<\/td>RTI <\/td>Penalty Proceeding<\/td>Link<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
05\/04\/2026<\/td>Hindu Husband's Obligation To Maintain Wife Attaches Even After Death; Widow Can Claim From Father-In-Law: Allahabad HC<\/td>Family Law<\/td>Wife Maintenance<\/td>Link<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
05\/04\/2026<\/td>Andhra Pradesh High Court Rules: Husband Gets No Share in Wife\u2019s Parental Property<\/td>Hindu Succession Act ruling<\/td>childless wife inheritance law<\/td>Link<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
05\/04\/2026<\/td>Interfaith live-in relationship not an offence, protected under Constitution: Allahabad HC<\/td>Police Protection \/ Article 21 Liberty Matter<\/td>interfaith live-in relationship<\/td>Link<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
05\/04\/2026<\/td>Daughter Entitled to Maintenance and Educational Expenses Even if She Attains Majority During Pendency of Proceedings: Madhya Pradesh High Court<\/td>Family Law <\/td>Major Daughter, Maintenance Rights<\/td>Link<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
05\/04\/2026<\/td>Wife\u2019s Right To Permanent Alimony U\/S 25 HMA Not Dependent On Her Children\u2019s Majority Or Earning Capacity: Rajasthan High Court<\/td>Family Law<\/td>Wife Maintenance<\/td>Link<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
05\/04\/2026<\/td>Public Servants Deemed To Be In Service Until Closing Hours, Can't Walk Away To Claim Cessation Of Employment: Madras High Court<\/td>Service Law <\/td>Disciplinary Proceedings<\/td>Link<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
05\/04\/2026<\/td>Counsel Sends Illness Slip But Appears Elsewhere: Allahabad High Court Imposes \u20b920,000 Costs<\/td>Professional Ethics<\/td>Illness Slip<\/td>Link<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
04\/04\/2026<\/td>Wife Absolute Owner Of 'Streedhan'; Husband May Use But Has Obligation To Restore It: Allahabad HC Quashes 406 IPC Case Against Wife<\/td>Matrimonial Criminal Case<\/td>Wife Absolute Owner of Streedhan<\/td>Link<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
04\/04\/2026<\/td>Non-Signatory Cannot Be Prosecuted Under Section 138 NI Act: Delhi High Court Quashes Summoning Order<\/td>Section 138 NI Act<\/td>cheque bounce case<\/td>Link<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
04\/04\/2026<\/td>No Right to Maintenance for Wife Who Chooses to Live Apart Without Cause: Bombay HC<\/td>Family Law <\/td>Wife Maintenance<\/td>Link<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
04\/04\/2026<\/td>Landlord Not Required to Prove \u2018Bona Fide Need\u2019 Under 2021 Tenancy Act: Allahabad High Court
\n<\/td>		UP Tenancy Act 2021<\/td>Landlord Tenant Dispute<\/td>Link<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
04\/04\/2026<\/td>No Need For Bone Ossification If Documents Prove Age Of Minor At The Time Of Incident: Allahabad High Court<\/td>JJ Act<\/td>Determination Of Age, Bone Ossification. Age of Minor<\/td>Link<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
04\/04\/2026<\/td>Blacklisting Not Automatic Consequence of Contract Termination; Requires Specific Show-Cause Notice: Supreme Court<\/td>Civil Appeal (arising out of SLP (C))<\/td>Blacklisting of Contractors<\/td>Link<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
04\/04\/2026<\/td>High Ranking Employee Can't Seek Same Lesser Penalty Given To Subordinates : Supreme Court Restores Bank Manager's Dismissal<\/td>Service Law<\/td>Parity in Disciplinary Punishment <\/td>Link<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
03\/04\/2026<\/td>Wife's Professional Competence, Earning Potential Can't Be Ignored While Deciding Maintenance: Allahabad High Court <\/td>Family Law <\/td>Wife Maintenance<\/td>Link<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
03\/04\/2026<\/td>Departmental Inquiry Not Needed After Bribery Conviction Of Govt Employee: MP High Court Upholds Dismissal<\/td>Service Law <\/td>Government Employee Dismissal, Departmental Inquiry, Bribery Conviction, Corruption Case, Prevention of Corruption Act<\/td>Link<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
03\/04\/2026<\/td>Patna HC Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Forest Officer, Says Public Servants Must Be Protected From Vexatious Prosecution
\n<\/td>		Service Law<\/td>Public servant, Section 197 CrPC, Discharge Of Official Duties<\/td>Link<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
03\/04\/2026<\/td>Talaq Takes Effect From the Day It Is Pronounced; Subsequent Decree Is Merely Declaratory, Says Allahabad High Court<\/td>Family Law <\/td>Muslim Personal Law, Talaq, Maintenance, Family Court, Second Marriage, Declaratory Decree<\/td>Link<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
02\/04\/2026<\/td>'Can't Use Criminal Law As Weapon To Implicate In-Laws In Matrimonial Discord': Karnataka High Court Quashes Cruelty FIR<\/td>Family Law <\/td>Dowry Harassment, Ensnare Entire Families<\/td>Link<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
02\/04\/2026<\/td>Maintenance A Recurring Entitlement; Wife Can Revive Old S. 125 CrPC Plea If Husband Breaches Settlement: Allahabad High Court<\/td>Family Law<\/td>Wife Maintenance<\/td>Link<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
02\/04\/2026<\/td>Obligations Toward Parents, Siblings Do Not Absolve Husband Of Primary Duty To Maintain Wife: Allahabad High Court<\/td>Family Law<\/td>Wife Maintenance <\/td>Link<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
02\/04\/2026<\/td>Departmental Charge-Sheet Not A Plaint; Evasive Reply Given To It Does Not Amount To Admission: Supreme Court<\/td>Service Law<\/td>Departmental Enquiry, Oral Inquiry, Natural Justice, Dismissal Order<\/td>Link<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
02\/04\/2026<\/td>Sadanand Sharma v. State of U.P. and 6 Others, Writ - A No. 14712 of 2024: Allahabad HC Questions Minister-Approved CSR 351-A Proceedings<\/td>Service Law<\/td>CSR 351A<\/td>Link<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
02\/04\/2026<\/td>No Dismissal After Retirement, Only Pensionary Action Permissible: Supreme Court Refuses to Interfere with Allahabad High Court Lucknow Bench Ruling<\/td>Service Law, Lucknow Bench <\/td>Departmental Proceedings, Post Retirement Dismissal, Pension Recovery, Article 351A CSR<\/td>Link<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
02\/04\/2026<\/td>Tribunal Sets Aside Punishment Imposed On Excise Officer In Spurious Liquor Death Matter<\/td>UP Public Service Tribunal <\/td>Deaths After Consuming Spurious Liquor<\/td>Link<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
30\/03\/2026<\/td>Legal Heirs Can Claim Medical Reimbursement If Government Employee Dies During Treatment<\/td>Allahabad High Court<\/td>Medical Reimbursement<\/td>Link<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
29\/03\/2026<\/td>\u201cAfter Granting Liquor Sale Licence, State Cannot Claim It Is Not a Fundamental Right\u201d: Allahabad High Court<\/td>UP Excise <\/td>Shop cancellation<\/td>Link<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
29\/03\/2026<\/td>Daughter-In-Law Not Legally Obligated To Maintain Parents-In-Law : Allahabad High Court<\/td>Allahabad High Court<\/td>Section 144 BNSS, maintenance to parents-in-law
\n<\/td>		Link<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
29\/03\/2026<\/td>No Offence If Married Man Stays In Live-In Relationship With Adult Woman: Allahabad High Court<\/td>Allahabad High Court, single judge<\/td>Live in Relationship, division bench observation
\n<\/td>		Link<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
29\/03\/2026<\/td>Married Persons Cannot Enter Into Live-In Relationship Without Obtaining Divorce: Allahabad HC Refuses Protection<\/td>Allahabad High Court, single judge view<\/td>Live in Relationship
\n<\/td>		Link<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
28\/03\/2026<\/td>Consent Has No Legal Relevance for Sexual Intercourse Within a Valid Marriage\u201d: Madhya Pradesh High Court Quashes Section 377 IPC Charge Against Husband<\/td>Criminal case<\/td>matrimonial rape <\/td>Link<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
28\/03\/2026<\/td>Liquor Trade Is Not a Fundamental Right: Madhya Pradesh High Court Upholds Suspension of Distillery Licences<\/td>MP Excise<\/td>Suspension of Distillery Licences<\/td>Link<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
26\/03\/2026<\/td>Punjab SIC Imposes \u20b925,000 Penalty on PIO for 30-Month RTI Delay, Issues Bailable Warrants<\/td>RTI<\/td>Bailable Warrant PIO<\/td>Link<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
22\/03\/2026<\/td>Supreme Court Big Decision Group Insurance Amount Cannot Be Deducted From Compensation Under Motor Vehicles Act<\/td>Motor accident claim<\/td>MACT<\/td>Link<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
22\/03\/2026<\/td>No proof of stridhan used in buying flat, no stay: HC upholds husband\u2019s flat sale, slaps Rs 60,000 monthly damages on wife<\/td>Husband Wife Case<\/td>Stridhan, Shared Household<\/td>Link<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
22\/03\/2026<\/td>Delay in Filing FIR Without Valid Reason Raises Doubt: Allahabad High Court<\/td>Criminal Appeal<\/td>FIR Delay<\/td>Link<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
22\/03\/2026<\/td>Military Service to Be Counted in Pension and Pay Fixation: Allahabad High Court<\/td>Service<\/td>Ex-Servicemen, Pension Rules<\/td>Link<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
21\/03\/2026<\/td>Tribunal Upholds Penalty Where Charged Employee Was Allowed to Cross-Examine Witnesses<\/td>Service<\/td>UP Public Service Tribunal, Departmental Proceedings<\/td>Link<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
21\/03\/2026<\/td>UP Public Service Tribunal Dismisses Police Officer\u2019s Petition Over Failure to Submit Reply<\/td>Service<\/td>UP Public Service Tribunal, Departmental Proceedings<\/td>Link<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
20\/03\/2026<\/td>S. 20(1) RTI Act Which Prescribes Penalty For Default In Supplying Info Within Specified Time Not Mandatory: Chhattisgarh High Court<\/td>RTI<\/td>RTI Act Section 20(1) penalty not mandatory, Delay in Supplying Information<\/td>Link<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
20\/03\/2026<\/td>Unjust To Sustain Departmental Findings After Acquittal On Identical Evidence: Bombay High Court Quashes CISF Officer\u2019s Dismissal<\/td>Service<\/td>Effect of Criminal Acquittal on Departmental Inquiry<\/td>Link<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
19\/03\/2026<\/td>Uncommunicated Adverse Entries In ACRs Can Be Considered For Passing Order Of Compulsory Retirement: Chhattisgarh HC<\/td>Service<\/td>Compulsory Retirement: <\/td>Link<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
19\/03\/2026<\/td>Bigamous marriage before appointment is not misconduct but affects eligibility: Allahabad High Court<\/td>Service <\/td>bigamous marriage<\/td>Link<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
15\/03\/2026<\/td>Missing records no ground to deny RTI info: Punjab State Information Commission<\/td>RTI<\/td>RTI<\/td>Link<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
14\/03\/2026<\/td>In absence of rules, no show-cause notice can be given to retired employees: Allahabad HC<\/td>service<\/td>Departmental Proceedings<\/td>Link<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
14\/03\/2026<\/td>Departmental Proceedings Are Initiated Only After Issuance Of Chargesheet And Not Merely On Issuance Of A Show Cause Notice: SC Reiterates<\/td>service<\/td>Departmental Proceedings<\/td>Link<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
14\/03\/2026<\/td>Supreme Court Upholds Conviction Of Excise Inspector In 35-Year-Old Bribery Case, Reduces Sentence Since Convict Now 75 Yr Old<\/td>Prevention of Corruption Act<\/td>trap case<\/td>Link<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
14\/03\/2026<\/td>Penalty Can Be Imposed Only for Deliberate Delay in Providing RTI Information: Allahabad High Court<\/td>RTI<\/td>Section 20(1) and Section 20(2) of the RTI Act<\/td>Link<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
14\/03\/2026<\/td>Parental income not sole test for OBC creamy layer<\/td>Service<\/td>OBC creamy layer, Reservation<\/td>Link<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
14\/03\/2026<\/td>Warning Is Not a Punishment, an Exonerated Employee Is Entitled to Full Salary and Allowances<\/td>Service<\/td>No Work No Pay, Suspension Salary<\/td>Link<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
09\/03\/2026<\/td>If Information Is Given And Perusal Of Records Is Permitted, Giving Copies Of Documents Not Necessary Under RTI Act: Allahabad High Court<\/td>RTI<\/td>Third-Party Consent<\/td>Link<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
08\/03\/2026<\/td>Can UPSC coaching centres publish mock interviews without consent? RTI query raises issue<\/td>RTI<\/td>Consumer Affairs, Coaching Institute, Personal Data, Mock Interview Publication<\/td>Link<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
05\/03\/2026<\/td>Acquittal In Criminal Case No Bar On Employer To Conduct Departmental Proceedings: MP High Court Denies Relief To Cop<\/td>Service<\/td>Criminal Acquittal, departmental enquiry<\/td>Link<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
02\/03\/2026<\/td>Referring To Someone By Their Profession Doesn't Attract SC\/ST Act Offence If No Intent To Humiliate: Allahabad High Court <\/td>Criminal<\/td>SC\/ST Act Latest Judgment, Profession Based Remark SC\/ST Act, Intent to Humiliate SC\/ST Case<\/td>Link<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
02\/03\/2026<\/td>Lodging FIR With an Advocate\u2019s Assistance Does Not By Itself Dilute Its Credibility: Allahabad High Court
\n
\n<\/td>		Criminal<\/td>FIR Drafted by Advocate, Legal Assistance in FIR<\/td>Link<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
02\/03\/2026<\/td>Lucknow Bench: No Recovery on Audit Objection Without Hearing\u2014Class III\/IV Deductions to Be Refunded in 8 Weeks<\/td>Service <\/td>Overpayment Recovery, Audit Objection, Supreme Court Rafiq Masih<\/td>Link<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
01\/03\/2026<\/td>Magistrate Cannot Return Complaint For Want Of Accused\u2019s Postal Address: Kerala HC
\n
\n<\/td>		Criminal<\/td>Complaint case<\/td>Link<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
01\/03\/2026<\/td>Trial Not Started Until Evidence; Amendment Allowed Before Testimony<\/td> Civil<\/td>Trial<\/td>Link<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
01\/03\/2026<\/td>Unjustified Delay in FIR Hits Credibility; No Arrest Till Next Order<\/td>Criminal<\/td>delay in FIR<\/td>Link<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>Proceedings Cannot Be Initiated Against a Retired Employee Without Prior Sanction of the Governor<\/td>Service<\/td>351-A Civil Services Regulations (CSR)<\/td>Link<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>Non-achieving of the target by itself cannot be constituted as major punishment<\/td>Service<\/td>departmental enquiry<\/td>Link<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>Disciplinary Proceedings Stayed for a Time-Barred Charge-Sheet; Employee Directed to be Reinstated <\/td>Service<\/td>departmental enquiry<\/td>Link<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>Lodging of FIR cannot be construed as misconduct<\/td>Service<\/td>departmental enquiry<\/td>Link<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>SC: BNSS 175(4) Complaint Against Public Servant Must Comply With 175(3) Preconditions<\/td>Criminal<\/td><\/td>Link<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>Oral Hearing\/Oral Inquiry is Mandatory in Disciplinary Proceedings<\/td>Service<\/td>departmental enquiry<\/td>Link<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>an acquittal in a criminal case merely on the \u201cbenefit of doubt\u201d (\u0938\u0902\u0926\u0947\u0939 \u0915\u093e \u0932\u093e\u092d) cannot, by itself, become a ground to restore employment \/ reinstate in service<\/td>Service<\/td>Criminal proceedings and departmental proceedings<\/td>Link<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>Dismissal Can\u2019t Be Based Solely on \u201cConviction\u201d\u2014A Reasoned Finding on \u201cConduct\u201d Is Mandatory<\/td>Service<\/td>Criminal proceedings and departmental proceedings<\/td>Link<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>Transfer policy 2025-2026 is directory only and not mandatory<\/td>Service<\/td>Transfer Policy<\/td>Link<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\u092c\u0940\u090f\u0928\u090f\u0938\u090f\u0938 \u0915\u0940 \u0927\u093e\u0930\u093e-175 (3) \u0915\u0947 \u0924\u0939\u0924 \u092e\u091c\u093f\u0938\u094d\u091f\u094d\u0930\u0947\u091f \u0939\u0930 \u092e\u093e\u092e\u0932\u0947 \u092e\u0947\u0902 \u090f\u092b\u0906\u0908\u0906\u0930 \u0915\u093e \u0906\u0926\u0947\u0936 \u0926\u0947\u0928\u0947 \u0915\u0947 \u0932\u093f\u090f \u092c\u093e\u0927\u094d\u092f \u0928\u0939\u0940\u0902<\/td>Criminal<\/td><\/td>Link<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\u0907\u0932\u093e\u0939\u093e\u092c\u093e\u0926 \u0939\u093e\u0908\u0915\u094b\u0930\u094d\u091f \u0928\u0947 \u0915\u0939\u093e-\u090f\u0915 \u092e\u093e\u092e\u0932\u0947 \u092e\u0947\u0902 \u092d\u0940 \u0932\u093e\u0917\u0942 \u0939\u094b \u0938\u0915\u0924\u093e \u0939\u0948 \u0917\u0948\u0902\u0917\u0938\u094d\u091f\u0930 \u090f\u0915\u094d\u091f<\/td>Criminal<\/td><\/td>Link<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\u091d\u0942\u0920\u0940 FIR \u0926\u0930\u094d\u091c \u0915\u0930\u093e\u0928\u0947 \u0935\u093e\u0932\u094b\u0902 \u092a\u0930 \u092a\u0941\u0932\u093f\u0938 \u0915\u0947 \u0932\u093f\u090f \u092e\u0941\u0915\u0926\u092e\u093e \u091a\u0932\u093e\u0928\u093e \u0905\u0928\u093f\u0935\u093e\u0930\u094d\u092f, \u092a\u093e\u0932\u0928 \u0928 \u0915\u0930\u0928\u0947 \u092a\u0930 IOs \u0915\u094b \u0905\u0935\u092e\u093e\u0928\u0928\u093e \u0915\u093e \u0938\u093e\u092e\u0928\u093e \u0915\u0930\u0928\u093e \u092a\u0921\u093c\u0947\u0917\u093e<\/td>Criminal<\/td>False FIR <\/td>Link<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\u0926\u0939\u0947\u091c \u0939\u0924\u094d\u092f\u093e \u092e\u0947\u0902 \u0939\u092e\u0947\u0936\u093e \u0909\u092e\u094d\u0930\u0915\u0948\u0926 \u0939\u0940 \u091c\u0930\u0942\u0930\u0940 \u0928\u0939\u0940\u0902<\/td>Criminal<\/td>Dowry<\/td>Link<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>WhatsApp Chats to Be Treated as Evidence in Maintenance Case; Order Set Aside, Matter Remanded<\/td>Family Law<\/td>Maintenance<\/td>Link<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\u092a\u0924\u093f \u0915\u0940 \u0939\u0948\u0938\u093f\u092f\u0924 \u0915\u0947 \u0939\u093f\u0938\u093e\u092c \u0938\u0947 \u092a\u0924\u094d\u0928\u0940 \u0915\u094b \u0938\u092e\u094d\u092e\u093e\u0928\u091c\u0928\u0915 \u091c\u0940\u0935\u0928 \u0915\u093e \u0905\u0927\u093f\u0915\u093e\u0930<\/td>Family Law<\/td>Maintenance<\/td>Link<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\u092c\u093f\u0915\u0928\u0947 \u0915\u0947 \u092c\u093e\u0926 \u0935\u093e\u0939\u0928 \u0939\u093e\u0926\u0938\u0947 \u0915\u0940 \u0938\u094d\u0925\u093f\u0924\u093f \u092e\u0947\u0902 \u0935\u0939\u0940 \u091c\u0935\u093e\u092c\u0926\u0947\u0939 \u091c\u093f\u0938\u0915\u093e \u0938\u0930\u0915\u093e\u0930\u0940 \u0930\u093f\u0915\u0949\u0930\u094d\u0921 \u092e\u0947\u0902 \u0939\u094b\u0917\u093e \u0928\u093e\u092e<\/td>Motor Accident Claim<\/td><\/td>View<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
26\/02\/2026<\/td>IT Returns Are Personal, Not Public: Karnataka HC Quashes CIC Order Directing Disclosure To Wife Under RTI; Issues Guidelines<\/td>RTI<\/td>RTI<\/td>View<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>Advocates cannot seek information under RTI Act for clients' cases: CIC<\/td>RTI<\/td><\/td>Link<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
15\/12\/2010<\/td>State of U.P. & Ors. v. Sangam Nath Pandey & Ors., Civil Appeal No. 4360 of 2010<\/td>Service Law <\/td>special recruitment<\/td>Link<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
23\/11\/2012<\/td>Civil Appeal No. 8263 of 2012 Chairman, LIC of India & Ors. v. A. Masilamani<\/td>Service Law<\/td>de novo enquiry<\/td>Link<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n\n

 <\/p>\n

<\/h2>\n

 <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

   <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"_regular_price":[],"currency_symbol":[],"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-4301","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"post_slider_layout_featured_media_urls":{"thumbnail":"","post_slider_layout_landscape_large":"","post_slider_layout_portrait_large":"","post_slider_layout_square_large":"","post_slider_layout_landscape":"","post_slider_layout_portrait":"","post_slider_layout_square":"","full":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lawduniya.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/4301","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lawduniya.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lawduniya.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lawduniya.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lawduniya.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=4301"}],"version-history":[{"count":104,"href":"https:\/\/lawduniya.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/4301\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":5184,"href":"https:\/\/lawduniya.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/4301\/revisions\/5184"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lawduniya.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=4301"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}